Why User Research Should Drive Your Digital Strategy
Understand why grounding your digital strategy in deep user research leads to smarter decisions, stronger products, and better outcomes.
Rahul Desai
VP of Research & Customer Insights
Table of contents
Share
Fintech buyers aren’t swayed by slogans—they’re convinced by proof. The fastest way to find that proof is disciplined, ongoing user research that shapes what you build, how you explain it, and how you earn trust.
In our first years at Vectura, we thought we had a messaging problem. We didn’t. We had a learning problem. Once we embedded research into every release—calls with controllers and CFOs, diary studies with AP teams, teardown sessions with security reviewers—conversion, retention, and sales velocity started moving together. The lesson: in fintech, research is not a nice-to-have; it’s risk management for your roadmap and your website.
The Cost of Assumptions
Designing without research is like underwriting without data lineage: possible, but reckless. Even experienced teams carry biases that quietly warp pages and products:
You might optimize for features when buyers care about downstream outcomes (close time, forecast variance, spend coverage).
You might overlook “procedure reality”—who actually clicks approve, when they do it, and on what device.
You might bury risk answers (data residency, SSO/SAML, audit trails, SOC 2/ISO 27001 posture) behind generic “Security” pages.
You might skip the buying committee, addressing Finance but not IT, Procurement, and Compliance—each with different anxieties.
The compound effect is expensive: longer sales cycles, stalled security reviews, and CPC budgets torched by slow, unclear pages. Assumptions feel fast. They’re not.
Research as Strategic Foundation
In fintech, research does more than fine-tune UX; it sets commercial strategy:
Goal clarity: Controllers don’t seek “AI”—they want fewer manual adjustments and faster reconciliations. Translate tech into outcomes.
Unstated needs: Compliance wants an exportable evidence trail, not just a badge wall. Build (and show) auditability.
Priority hierarchy: Sequencing matters. A gorgeous dashboard won’t compensate for unclear roles, approvals, or data ownership.
Context understanding: Month-end is chaos; mobile behaviors spike during approvals; VPN policies break naive integration plans.
This body of evidence keeps stakeholders aligned to facts over opinions—and it prevents the “beautiful, wrong thing” from shipping.
Practical Integration Methods
You don’t need a lab to get rigorous. Here’s the cadence that actually sticks inside a busy team:
Continuous pulses. Ten 20-minute interviews per month across Finance Ops, IT, and Compliance. Tag notes by objection theme (fees, integration effort, security posture).
Mixed methods. Pair analytics (what happened) with qualitative why (calls, support tickets, and sales Gong snippets). Triangulate before you rewrite a headline.
Collaborative readouts. Bring GTM, Product, Design, and Legal into 30-minute synthesis sessions. Decide one page change and one product change per session—ship both.
Research repository. Centralize insights with tags like “SSO,” “ERP integration,” “delegated approvals.” Each insight should link to a specific website section or artifact to update next.
From Insight to Action
Insights matter only if they change pages, demos, and scopes of work. Five common findings—and what we do immediately:
“Hidden fees fear stalls evaluation.”
Publish a transparent pricing explainer with real scenarios (entities, seats, payment terms) and an “effective rate” calculator. Create a one-paragraph summary for AEs to paste into emails.“Security review slows deals.”
Move Security above the fold on key pages. List data flows, residency options, SSO/SAML, audit logs, and retention defaults. Offer a downloadable security brief and a two-minute Loom on controls.“Integration effort is vague.”
Add an integrations matrix: supported ERPs/banks, typical time-to-live, who does what (your team vs. theirs), and rollback/exit steps. Include a sandbox link and a 5-step “hello world.”“Approvals are the bottleneck.”
Lead with process reality: delegate rules, thresholds, mobile approvals, and exception handling. Show a “month-end before/after” timeline with fewer handoffs and clearer ownership.“Executives need outcomes, not features.”
Rewrite hero copy to lead with measurable results and the three needles you move. Put a one-screen KPI snapshot near the top of product pages—then link to methodology in the FAQ.
Each change gets a metric: scroll depth to the Security section, click-throughs on pricing scenarios, sandbox signups, demo-to-security-complete conversion. Review monthly, change something weekly.
What This Looks Like on the Website
A research-led fintech site tends to converge on a familiar shape:
Outcome-first hero with a crisp claim and proof (case metrics, analyst notes, or awards).
Risk & reliability panel that answers security, uptime, and data governance without making buyers dig.
Integration reality with architecture, time estimates, and supported systems.
Role-aware storytelling so Finance, IT, and Compliance see themselves—and what changes for them—on day one.
Docs-style FAQ for procurement and legal: DPIAs, DPAs, SLAs, sub-processors, data residency, breach notifications.
Performance-first build so paid traffic lands on pages that load fast and feel trustworthy.
If you’re using the Vectura template, you already have slots for each of these elements; the job is to wire your research into those slots and measure the lift.
